“Media” and “Public Sphere” both word has got different significant values and definition but they are connected with each other. “God is all knowing and all-powerful. He is a spirit, not a body, and he exists both outside us and within us. God is always with us, because He is everywhere. We can never fully understand him, because He works in mysterious ways. In broad terms, this describes the God of our fathers, but it also describes electronic media, the second God, which man has created” (Tony Schwarthz, 1983). Millions listen to the same networks, hum the same commercial jingles; share with soap opera characters the testing of souls, the mystery of love and death. So by this perspective we can image about its’ power. On the other hand the public sphere consisted of organs of information and political debate such as newspapers and journals, as well as institutions of political discussion such as parliaments, political clubs, literary salons, public assemblies, pubs and coffee houses, meeting halls, and other public spaces where socio-political discussion took place. There is contradiction about the concepts of public sphere. Habermas’s concept of the public sphere thus described a space of institutions and practices between the private interests of everyday life in civil society and the realm of state power. The public sphere thus mediates between the domains of the family and the workplace, where private interests prevail, and the state, which often exerts arbitrary forms of power and domination. And the bourgeois public sphere, which began appearing around 1700, was to mediate between the private concerns of individuals in their familial, economic, and social life contrasted to the demands and concerns of social and public life.
The principles of the public sphere involved an open discussion of all issues of general concern in which discursive argumentation was employed to ascertain general interests and the public good. The public sphere thus presupposed freedoms of speech and assembly, a free press, and the right to freely participate in political debate and decision-making. The media, state, and business are the major institutional forces of contemporary capitalist societies, that the media “mediate” between state, economy, and social life, and that the mainstream broadcasting media have not been promoting democracy or serving the public interest and thus are forfeiting their crucial structural importance in constructing a democratic society.
In this issue entitled, Why the cross-media laws should go-for all our sakes by Fred Hilmer(The Age 5th June 2002 page.15) is a good article to verify our media democracy. But democratic theory also developed stronger notions of citizen participation, or what has become known as participatory democracy, in theorists such as Rousseau, Marx, and Dewey. In this conception, famously expressed by Abraham Lincoln, democracy is government by, of, and for the people. For such a conception of radical democracy to work, to create a genuinely participatory democracy, the citizens must be informed, they must be capable of argumentation and participation, and they must be active and organized to become a transformative democratic political force. By all means it is clear that a well functioning public sphere is a necessary pre-requisite of all democratic societies.
In respect to community standards and censorship, Office of Film and Literature Classification
does a good job. Films and videotapes, whether they are locally made or come from overseas, have to be classified before they can be sold, hired or shown public in Australia.
Classification is done by the classification board (the Board) which is located at the Sydney based office of film and literature classification.
Before making its classification decision the board is required to reflect contemporary community standard and must apply criteria, which are set out in the nation classification code (the Code).
The code is determined under the classification ACT 1995.
Classification decision are given following some principles –
a. Adults should be able to read, hear and see what they want-
b. Minor should be protected from material likely to harm or disturb them
c. Everyone should be protected from exposure to unsolicited material that they find offensive
d. The need to take account of community concerns about:
(i) depictions that condone or incite violence, particularly sexual
violence; and
(ii) the portrayal of persons in a demeaning manner.
The code names and broadly describes the six classification categories like G, PG, M, MA, R and X. MA, R and X is legally restricted categories. By law the board must apply both the code and the guidelines when making classification decisions.
Basically it is helping the media to get in to the public sphere. The guidelines are revised from time to time in consolation with members of the public, community groups and organizations, including contributors of research.
I would like to say that in this digital age of technology, media playing an important role in every aspect of human life. We are connected with each other and for a complete democratic society media should be at the center of the public sphere.